A force does not lose an engagement because it lacked a sensor. It loses because the radar that held the track, the battery that could have serviced it and the commander who could have authorised the shot were on three different systems, procured in three different decades, speaking three different formats. The track existed. The magazine existed. The path between them did not.

• Sensing on the left, effects on the right, one custody model in the middle. Any node on either side can be ours, the customer's, or a third party's. The grid is indifferent to which.
• Aorizon — the sovereign foundation model, and the picture it holds. It reads sensor telemetry as a first-class modality, which is what lets it turn every sensor a force owns into one continuously maintained picture.
• Talon — effector pairing and engagement management. Talon takes a target and finds the right effect for it across everything on the grid, under an authority chain that is explicit at every step.
• Sentinel — installation and force protection, layer by layer. Sentinel holds the defensive picture for a base, a convoy or a formation and runs the layered response automatically under standing authority.

↳ The sensor that saw it is almost never the shooter that can reach it. The grid compresses the four steps either side of the human.